User talk:Daniele.tampieri

Welcome!

Hello, Daniele.tampieri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - crz crztalk 20:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Good luck. Let me know if you need any help. - crz crztalk 21:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Extensive TeXification, etc

Hi. Thank you for your contributions. And just a few notes about style. First, putting too much TeX and replacing HTML with TeX is not always a good idea. Per the math style manual, inline formulas better be left as HTML, so ''x''² or <math>x^2</math> are better than <math>x^2\,</math>.

Also, and more importantly, if there is a formula at the end of sentence, one should put a period (.) at the end of that formula, it signifies that the sentence is over.

These are small things, but I thought I'd let you know. You can reply here if you have comments. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

And one should not put links in section headings, so

== Logic/Model theory definition ==

should be

 == Logic/Model theory definition ==

Chers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Links

Not sure I understood all of it, but it all sounds fine. WP:EL is the relevant guideline. Good luck. - crz crztalk 22:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed you had added a link to milstd.net. That site has been systematically spamming Wikipedia using what I suspect are open proxies. I know you're not a spammer, but I thought you'd want to know. Perhaps there's another, more Wikipedia-friendly site you could use. Thanks, --A. B. ^(talk) 15:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

PS Thanks for all your work on electronics-related articles.

Try this link: http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/

Messy and illegible notation

I think this edit is unfortuanate. You wrote:

$p(x)$∈K$[x]$,

rather than either

$p(x)\in \mathbf {K} [x],$

or perhaps

$p(x)$ ∈ K$[x]$

(with suitable spacing).

Moreover, as I think Oleg Alexandrov already pointed out to you, although "displayed" TeX looks very good on Wikipedia, "inline" TeX often looks terrible. Michael Hardy 21:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and first of all thank you for your advices. Regarding the notation for the vector space of polynomials (which is also a ring and thus an algebra) common practice requires

$p(x)\in \mathbb {K} [x],$

but as you (and Oleg) already pointed out "inline" TeX looks very often bad, so I tried (unsuccesfully) to arrange an inline notation giving the same flavor of the standard. I think that a solution could be to give the same information on the same line of the formula below, to enhance clarity and aesthetics: please check. :) Daniele.tampieri 22:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: \scriptstyle

Question about \scriptstyle use discipline in mathematical typing.

I replied on my talk page. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

BV functions

Hi. I see you did expand quite a bit the bounded variation article. If you would like to write more on BV functions in n-dimensions, note the following article on PlanetMath: BV function. That stuff can be copied legally to Wikipedia (see our WP:PMEX project), and we have a tool which can easily convert things to Wikipedia format (you would need the article id to use the tool, which you can see in the URL of that article, id=6969).

So, I wonder if you are interested in expanding bounded variation with that material. I can help along the way with formatting and stuff (I know about BV functions also, but not a whole lot). You can reply here in either case (I will keep this page on my watchlist). Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Oleg. Yes, I am interested in expanding Bounded variation with the article on PlanetMath BV function: as you can see I added an external link to that page some times ago. Of course, I would like to add more from other references (mainly from Giusti and Hudjaev and Vol'pert books, since they are "richer" both from the theory and applications point of view), and of course I would be glad if you decide to help me enriching this voice: recently I edited the Germ voice with Nbarth, and he helped me a lot showing me the deep sheaf theoretic aspect of the subject. Now I am at work, so I cannot show you the details of the plan of the voice that I have in mind, but later I'll write you something on your talk page. :) Daniele.tampieri 13:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Great. Thank you for your work on math articles. If you need anything, just let me know. I have bounded variation on my watchlist and I will keep an eye on what you are doing there. :) Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Everyone interested can see the proposed voice layout and further discussion Daniele.tampieri 07:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

And also the talk page related to the voice has contains some information. Daniele.tampieri 16:25, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Avalanche bjt base trigger.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Avalanche bjt base trigger.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Gaetano Fichera.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Gaetano Fichera.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Wow!

Hi: I just wanted to let you know that I am incredibly impressed by your article on the Signorini problem. It's fascinating reading. Cheers, Ray^Talk 05:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Severi.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Severi.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Fichera.jpeg

File:Fichera.jpeg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Fichera.jpeg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Fichera.jpeg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Oleinik.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Oleinik.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Severi.jpeg is now available as Commons:File:Severi.jpeg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Vasilii Sergeevich Vladimirov.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Vasilii Sergeevich Vladimirov.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Zappa.jpeg is now available as Commons:File:Zappa.jpeg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Copernicus at Bologna

Thanks for the beautiful photos. They were much needed, to provide a concrete connection for Copernicus with Italy. I missed seeing the house and plaque when I visited Bologna. Thanks! Nihil novi (talk) 21:15, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome: I walk along that way almost weekly, so I thought it was nice to add some pics to the English Wikipedia entry about Copernicus. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I've had similar experiences of going for a walk and returning with photos of historically or culturally interesting sites that I've encountered. You're fortunate to live in a beautiful city in a beautiful country. Nihil novi (talk) 06:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Mihlin/Mikhlin

Suits me fine. It makes sense for the transliteration to match that of his Wikipedia biography page. Thanks for the heads-up, nonetheless. :-) (By the way, not that it matters, but I think that as well as Stein, Grafakos uses the "Mihlin" transliteration in his books, though I don't have my copy to hand to check...) Tcnuk (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Probably even Grafakos refers mainly to the English translation of (Mikhlin 1948) where the transliteration is "Mihlin" (or at least I think so... since I haven't a copy of the translated paper :D).Daniele.tampieri (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

• Mikhlin, Solomon G. (1948), "Singular integral equations", Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, 3 (3(25)): 29–112, MR 0027429 (in Russian).

I have marked you as a reviewer

I have added the "reviewers" property to your user account. This property is related to the Pending changes system that is currently being tried. This system loosens page protection by allowing anonymous users to make "pending" changes which don't become "live" until they're "reviewed". However, logged-in users always see the very latest version of each page with no delay. A good explanation of the system is given in this image. The system is only being used for pages that would otherwise be protected from editing.

If there are "pending" (unreviewed) edits for a page, they will be apparent in a page's history screen; you do not have to go looking for them. There is, however, a list of all articles with changes awaiting review at Special:OldReviewedPages. Because there are so few pages in the trial so far, the latter list is almost always empty. The list of all pages in the pending review system is at Special:StablePages.

To use the system, you can simply edit the page as you normally would, but you should also mark the latest revision as "reviewed" if you have looked at it to ensure it isn't problematic. Edits should generally be accepted if you wouldn't undo them in normal editing: they don't have obvious vandalism, personal attacks, etc. If an edit is problematic, you can fix it by editing or undoing it, just like normal. You are permitted to mark your own changes as reviewed.

The "reviewers" property does not obligate you to do any additional work, and if you like you can simply ignore it. The expectation is that many users will have this property, so that they can review pending revisions in the course of normal editing. However, if you explicitly want to decline the "reviewer" property, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Bounded variation --> lp spaces

Bug corretto, grazie per la segnalazione! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 05:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Redlinks

Saw the discussion at SunCountryGuy's talkpage; naw, redlinks are not only fine but highly appreciated! It gives people hints on what to do, and shows anyone reading the article potential projects. I find it quite helpful :). Ironholds (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much: I'll wait SunCountryGuy's answer, if any, and then I'll restore the redlinks. After all, even the entry "Giovanni Battista Rizza was a redlink until yesterday evening. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, I saw that the answers of Jessy show rationality and a tentative insight, therefore I would like to discuss more the issues with him. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

His answers are quite simply wrong ;p. Our inclusion criteria for scientists, theorists and academics such as Lucilla Bassoti include "has won a prestigious award" - which she has. Ironholds (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Daniele.tampieri. You have new messages at SunCountryGuy01's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I read your comments: thank you for your the reference links WP:GNG, WP:ACADEMIC, they are quite useful. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I too saw your message on SunCountryGuy's talkpage and it seems to me that nobody has pointed you to the relevant guideline yet, which is Wikipedia:Red link. If they have already and I wasn't paying enough attention, please disregard my message... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:31, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Sorry I hastily deleted it :( (didn't think about it). My name is Christos chatzifountas . The case i wrote is not the one dimensional it merely uses one dimensional BMO on the circle to define the BMOH on the disc (thus the change from I to D in H(D)). The point is that currently the research is centered on analytic and harmonic hardy spaces, and when you use the term "Hardy space" you usualy mean the analytic Hardy space in the disc or in the plane (one can use the one or the other and with some care the results are interchangeable) so i changed the one that used Feferman's notation to the more current "real valued harmonic Hardy spaces".The rest of the notation about BMO is used "as is". Also i plan to put something about the VMOA, the dual of H^1(D) (or H^1(R^2_+)). Thank you for correcting the entries and if you find something ambiguous please do it again :)

I added at the end Daniel' notes they are pretty advanced and cover pretty much everything in the subject. Of course there are other applications of bmo (in probability theory and PDES) and if you want to take a look there are references there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palepson (talk • contribs) 08:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. :D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The edit you made

Looks good. :) Good catch. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 12:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Enzo Martinelli.jpg

is {{PD-Italy}}, thus if you have a higher-resolution version of it, please upload. Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

author field at template:mactutor

Hi,

did your proposal at Template_talk:MacTutor#A_proposal ever receive any response?

thanks, Sasha (talk) 15:16, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

No, it apparently didn't attract anyone's attention. However, I did not solicit anyone for an answer: are you interested in it? You are welcome, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I was looking for the author field (to give proper credit to Maligranda at Torsten Carleman), and then I saw your proposal. So I guess we are now 2 in favour (with no-one opposed), this is consensus, right? Sasha (talk) 16:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I think it is so, and I also think that there are other ones that would like to use such a feature: after all, even if O'Connor and Robertson wrote the major part of Mactutor bios, other authors contributed to the project, and a correct attribution is a nice thing, especially in Wikipedia. However, maybe it is a good idea to involve someone else, like Oleg Alexandrov, my favorite math admin, and ask for its advice. Please keep in contact with me if you need support. Best regards, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 17:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I have left him a note. Best regards, Sasha (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Following Oleg's suggestion Sasha (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Template:Mactutor_once_again Sasha (talk) 23:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

		The Template Barnstar
		you are the Template Champion Sasha (talk) 21:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the barnstar Sasha: tomorrow we'll talk about the template and the entry about Shoshana Kamin. :-D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 21:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Shoshana Kamin

Hi Daniele,

I have looked through the article about Shoshana Kamin, and one thing surprised me: why do you write "at the same time and independently of Olga Oleinik"? S.K. was a PhD student of Oleinik (see Susanna L'vovna Kamenomostskaya at the Mathematics Genealogy Project), so independently can hardly apply. Also, Rubinstein writes in several places that Oleinik generalised the results of S.K. (pp.11–12, 310).

Best, Sasha (talk) 01:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sasha,

concerning my entry about Shoshana Kamin, I wrote that (almost surely wrong) statement probably due to the fact that I read too quickly and not carefully enough the sources I reported there and on the related entry about Olga Arsenievna Oleinik. As a matter of fact, I created the stub entry on S.K. in order to provide context for the O.O. entry on a notability basis, but then I "frozen" my contributions to the two entries without reviewing my writings carefully since

1. I am working on several topics other than biographies, more interesting and much needed for my professional improvement,
2. I am still learning the Russian language, and my level is still beyond the elementary level needed to read the original papers of S.K., O.O. and other related sources and, even if I own a copy of Rubinstein work, I decided to not continue my contribution until I am not able to review all sources (as you may have already guessed, I have a restricted access to the resources, including English translations of original works, normally available to academicians since I'm not an academician).
3. I wasn't able to find much material (especially surveys) related to S.K. biography or research/teaching work on the web.

These are the main reasons that probably caused the occurrence of that and other not completely correct/dead wrong statements in the main text of the entry :-D. If you would like to review and correct the entry, I'd be truly happy. At last, I want also to thank you for finding the {{MathGenealogy}} reference and the complete Russian name of S.K.: I'll surely add 'em to the entry and correct the imprecise statement you found, when I'll have some time. Best,Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Daniele,

I did not mean to criticise you, just to make sure I read the sources properly myself (since you wrote this at two places). Though I am a native Russian speaker and do have access to some of the resources, I did not manage to find good sources either (even for what I am almost sure is true, e.g. that she is the daughter of the Habima actress Hava Eidelman).

Best regards,

Sasha (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

PS your talk page is on my watchlist (from our previous correspondence), so you do not have to leave talkback messages.

Hi Sasha,

please do not worry, I did not feel criticized, at least in a non-constructive way: I'm just an electronics engineer so I'm used to analyze my design choices in an articulated way, to understand the reasons of success and failure. ;-D :-D :-D :-D You are welcome!

You helped me a lot with my proposal on the {{MacTutor}} template (did you notice that I'm trying some solutions?), and I also like your contributions, especially the one on Mikhail Kadets, a scientist whose research on series on (Banach or Locally convex) vector spaces I appreciate very much.

Well, now let's go back to the Shoshana Kamin entry: you have done a nice work, but our problem is still that there are few sources about her biography on the web. A possible solution would be to consult the yearbooks of Tel-Aviv University, if this university publishes a yearbook: this is usually a reliable secondary source and refers of career steps and other academic events, interesting from a biographical point of view. At present I'm trying this solution to improve the biographical part of the Giovanni Battista Rizza entry: I wrote to the Rector of the Università di Parma to ask for the permission to consult their yearbook archives (this is the praxis I've chosen, even if the same series is freely accessible in several other libraries) and an expert librarian is now helping me in my search of published sources. Would it be possible to try this solution even for S,K.? All the Best, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Daniele,

I will try to check about the yearbook.

Now, another question: are you sure about the first name? I was sure it is Сусанна; I did not find a good ref., but this text avout Felix Berezin agrees with me.

All the best, Sasha (talk) 15:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sasha,

I hope you'll succed in find something in the yearbook. Now the question: No, I'm not sure; the source you supplied is right (is it a reliable source according to WP:RS? Would it be possible to cite it? It seems to me that it contains also an article on Solomon Mikhlin used in the Russian Wiki). I first translitterated her name using grammar rules and obtained "Сусанна" but after a Google search I found out that this is not a common Russian name, therefore I decided to trust again on Google by using a machine translation. Lesson learned: trust grammar rules! :-D

Now I must justify other changes and I've done and also other peculiarities of my

1. WP:APPENDIX describes the standard structure of sections of a Wikipedia entry. I noticed this only a month ago, and found that almost all the entries I worked to were out of standard: from then onward I change the structure of the entries I am working to according to this policy.
2. as you surely noted, I use heavily the {{citation}} template, since as you can see in the WP:CT page, you can cite all kind of sources using this template, and also it helps me very much when the source has a non standard structure, i.e. it is published in series, is a paper in a series of proceedings, collection or other.
3. I do not usually fold the fields of the template (I keep them vertically aligned) since it saves me and other occasional editors time when adding some detail to sources. However this is largely a matter of taste, and of course it is not a rule.
4. I expand a little bit the content of the footnotes, if possible, but this is again a matter of taste, and again it is not a rule.

If you find disturbing my edit habits, please tell me and I'll do all the best I can to improve it. :-D

Now back to the Shoshana Kamin entry: if your search in the yearbook will be successful and you'll be able to find more biographical details, we can put in the entry a {{Infobox scientist}} template. Maybe you would like to use it in the entries about scientists you created: someone do not like it, but I think it lets you give a quick and informative look on the contents of a bio entry. Well, that's all for now. I hope I have not annoyed you too much! :-D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Daniele,

I never had the patience to read WP:APPENDIX, but I will do my best to follow your conventions (although I apologise in advance, Michael Hardy had to work for half a year before I learned the difference between ndash, -, and minus:).

The problem with these sources is that I think Tikhomirov (as well as Milman) wrote from memory. There is a paper of S.K. dated 1973 with TAU affiliation (her last paper with the name Kamenomostskaya), it is more reliable for chronology. Except for that (and the yearbook which I will try to check), I do not have good ideas for secondary sources.

this contains some information about Hava Eidelman (I can translate it for you), but the connection to S.K. is not mentioned there.

Best regards, Sasha (talk) 22:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sasha,

after solving the {{MacTutor}} template problem, we can talk about our Shoshana Kamin entry: first of all, I think it would be not useful to translate the link you found now, since it does not specify the relationship about H.E. and S.K.: maybe it will be a nice source of information in later stages of our development, if we get other sources confirming their family tie. Now I have a few questions:

1. Is its 1973 paper the one he published in the Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis? Otherwise do you have a PDF copy of it? I would be interesting to cite it, even just to have a source which confirms her name change.
2. I would like to place in the "Pubblications" sections more references to her work, basing on the works by Rădulescu and Vázquez: in particular I would like to cite its 1975 Archive paper and the other one Vázquez acknowledges as fundamental in the theory of the porous medium equation. Did you think it could be a good idea? I'd also would like to read more of Rădulescu, in order to detail more of her work on other topics by citing other papers.

Now I have a question about another entry I am working to, the one about Aizik Isaakovich Vol'pert. Do you think that if I write to the Technion library asking for infos about him published in their yearbook I'll get an answer? I asked to his son Vladimir and Vitaly to write a review about him, but they are very busy and the haven't been able to write and publish such a paper (and I also suspect it would be difficult to find a journal interested in publishing it), therefore it would be nice to find other biographical sources. All the best, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Daniele,

1. the paper you found is better, it indeed confirms the name change. I saw the one in Isr. Journal, "The asymptotic behavior of the solution of the filtration equation", I can send you the PDF.
2. why not?
3. you can try. I have not found the old yearbooks in the Tel Aviv library catalogue (perhaps it is better to write them too). Also you can try contacting one of the organisers of the Volpert conference. I will also look for some sources.

Best, Sasha (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sasha,

if you can send me the PDF of her paper in the Israel Journal of mathematics, I'll surely cite it and other papers marked as fundamental by Rădulescu and Vázquez: I'll also contact the library of Tel-Aviv University and of the Technion in order to check for availability of yearbook informations about the two scientists. I must say I have already asked to the organizers of the conference, but they had no useful (i.e. Wikipedia verifiable) data on him: they kindly passed my request to the Vol'pert brothers, who anyway were already contacted by me. However, you can try, and as usual any nice addition to the entry is welcome! Daniele.tampieri (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Daniele,

sorry for not responding for a while, I have to finish some work. I will be back soon.

Sasha (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sasha,

do not worry. It is nice to be a Wikipedian, but real life need always our full attention and commitment. You'll answer when you'll have time to do so, and Good Work. :-D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Locally integrable function

		The Original Barnstar
		Hello Daniele Tampieri, I think you deserve this Barnstar for all your fine work (including the notes and precise references) on the article Locally integrable function. Schmock (talk) 17:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Functional derivative

Regarding your edit summary "Changes per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(mathematics)#Article_introduction: alphabetically ordered references. See talk page".[1] I looked at the Talk page for Functional derivative but didn't see anything from you.[2] I'm mainly concerned about the changes you made to the lead, which don't appear to be an improvement. --Bob K31416 (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Bob, sorry for forgetting to add a note about my edits on the Functional derivative talk page. I suddenly got busy on doing another more urgent (for me) task, and I completely forgot it: however, thanks to your reminder, I'm writing it now. I apologize beforehand for I'll not answer to your observations (if you have some) immediately. Best, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 16:56, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Solomon Mikhlin.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Solomon Mikhlin.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Theo (could I call you so?). I've already noticed your previous messages, and I am working to get all the data from the owners. It will be a question of few more days, so please be patient. By the way would you like to check all the images I uploaded? I'm almost sure I've filled all the details, but a comprehensive check would be useful. :D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 07:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry about it! All the images that you have upload have already been checked--this is the only one left. I appreciate your help! —Theopolisme (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Solomon Mikhlin.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Solomon Mikhlin.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you.

Hi Theo, I have asked the details about authorship of that image to Vladimir Maz'ya and Tatyana Shaposhnikova: while they do not remember who did the photo, they own it. As I stated in the image page, they digitized it and I uploaded it to the English Wikipedia: yesterday I also submitted a new Declaration of consent for all enquiries in order to remove all copyright problems about it. I hope this would suffice, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 06:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

That's great; thanks. —Theopolisme (talk) 21:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

A.I.Volpert in Mathematical Chemistry

Dear Colleague, for your attention, I prepared (incomplete) bibliography of the works of A.I.Volpert in Math. Chemistry. The first paper has been very important for Russian Math. Chem. community but has been published in the preprint form only. The second paper about Quasi-equilibrium approximation (if we follow precisely the chemical kinetics terminology) had also great influence. The two series of papers, about bifurcation analysis and about waves (with some intersection between them) are seminal and very well known.

1. A.I. Volpert, "Qualitative methods of investigation of equations of chemical kinetics." Preprint, Inst. Chem. Phys., Chernogolovka (1976).
2. V.M. Vasiliev, A. I. Volpert, and S. I. Hudiaev. "On the method of quasi-stationary concentrations for chemical kinetics equations." Ž. Vych. Mat. Mat. Fyz 13.3 (1973): 683-697.
3. V.A. Volpert, A.I. Volpert, Convective instability of reaction fronts: linear stability analysis, European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1998, Volume 9, Issue 5 (1998), 507-525.
4. V.A. Volpert, A.I. Volpert, Existence and stability of traveling waves in chemical kinetics, in Dynamics of Chemical and Biological Systems, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1989, pp. 56-131.
5. V.A. Volpert, A.I. Volpert, AG Merzhanov, Analysis of nonunidimensional combustion modes by bifurcation theory methods, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 263, no. 4, pp. 918-921, 1982
6. V.A. Volpert, A.I. Volpert, A.G. Merzhanov, "Application of the theory of bifurcations in study of the spinning combustion waves." In Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 262, pp. 642-645. 1982.
7. V.A. Volpert, A.I. Volpert, A.G. Merzhanov, "Application of the theory of bifurcations to the study of unsteady regimes of combustion." Fizika Goreniia i Vzryva 19 (1983): 69-72.

With best regards, Agor153 (talk) 23:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Wonderful! Would it be possible for me to get a scanned copy of the 1976 preprint? You can contact me also privately by e-mail. Thank you very much! Daniele.tampieri (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I live very far from Russia and cannot find this preprint. It migh be possible that Prof Valery Bykov from Moscow can help you <vibykov@mail.ru>. He is a very kind person and you can contact him directly.Agor153 (talk) 10:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

PS. Do you read Russian (this preprint is in Russian)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agor153 (talk • contribs) 10:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm learning Russian: I'm using an old but nice text specifically designed for scientist, titled "Il russo scientifico" (Scientific Russian), and I try to read original works mainly taken from the All-Russian Mathematical Portal. Thank you very much for Prof. Bikov's email. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 15:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for the barnstar. Hmains (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry John Stephen Smith may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Riemann's paper "Über die Darstellbarkeit einer Function durch eine trigonometrische Reihe" (On the representability of a function by a trigonometric series, submitted to the University of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:20, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Probably I removed the ")" during the edits. Thank you BracketBot. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:56, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Giovanni Battista Rizza 2003.ipg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Giovanni Battista Rizza 2003.ipg.jpg, which you've attributed to Giovanni Battista Rizza. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ron: as the digitizer and uploader of the image, I've asked Prof. Rizza to fill a Declaration of consent for all enquiries and send it to me via e-mail. Please be patient: It's only a matter of a few weeks, since prof. Rizza is 89 and still very busy: I've not placed the {{OTRS pending}} since I haven't received the e-mail yet. Thank you very much for your help and patience. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 04:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

An update. Prof. Rizza still hasn't sent me the declaration of consent. If it is necessary to remove the image, do it: when I'll receive the e-mail with the proper permissions, I'll upload it again. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 06:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

An update II. I received a signed permission from Prof. Rizza and Prof. Bassotti and submitted a scan of it to the licensing guys: I hope it will suffice. Thank you to you all!  :-D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 05:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Enzo Martinelli.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Enzo Martinelli.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

IEEE technical societies

If you are a member of one or more of the IEEE technical societies, you may wish to identify yourself as such on Wikipedia. I’ve created Wikipedian categories for each of the 38 IEEE technical societies. The new Template:User IEEE member creates a userbox identifying the society and your membership grade and includes your user page in the relevant Wikipedian category. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note. Yours aye,  Buaidh  18:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC) — IEEE Life Member

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Avalanche BJT equiv circ-1.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:BJT bias.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I checked it only now. It seems that everything is right: I did the file and uploaded it releasing to the public domain. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Daniele.tampieri. You have new messages at Ezhiki's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

thanks!

why, thank you for the unexpected barnstar, quite a thoughtful and encouraging thing! --Lockley (talk) 18:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

You deserve it: updating entries categorization is a really big and needed work. It makes Wikipedia more and more useful, so keep on working! ;-D Best, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 04:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Request WP Library Reading: Article on medical practice of feticide

Hi Daniele, I noticed that you have access to Elsevier through the WP Library. I wanted to read a particular article that's within their library in order to answer a question. Here's the article: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953607004546 My question is, when and how is professional discretion used by doctors in this context? Do medical organizations advise doctors to withhold information from patients regarding procedures (including injections) on their own bodies? Thanks, -146.23.3.250 (talk) 15:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

I have only access to the Physical Sciences section and also my account is approved but still not active. Best regards. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 07:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 13 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Aizik Volpert page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Daniele.tampieri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saint-Petersburg Mathematical Society logo Oct. 2016.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saint-Petersburg Mathematical Society logo Oct. 2016.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 14:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Ron, please feel free to remove it immediately. I seems that the logo maker released the original image under a Creative Commons Licence, therefore the image I uploaded is not needed anymore. Best, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Daniele.tampieri. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Mazya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palazzo Corsini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Daniele.tampieri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Daniele.tampieri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IEEE Electron Devices Society

The article IEEE Electron Devices Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sub-group of notable organisation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Daniele.tampieri. Thank you for your work on Paolo Emilio Ricci. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this interesting biography.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

You are welcome, Rosiestep: I hope to improve it further in the next days, months, years. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)